Obviously the Minister has to take time to read the judgement. However, she welcomes the fact that on the main substantive points her decision was sound. The arguments against her, i.e. that she had failed to consult, that her mind was made up, or that she had no right to take the decision, were thrown out by the court. The judge in effect ruled that the problem was an “error in procedure”. The Minister maintains she was right to stop funding the UDA linked project at that time and would take the same decision again.
